Skip to main content
diagram

Set Up Review Process

Configure the review infrastructure, select a review strategy, and define reviewer roles and permissions for your risk analysis documents.

Configure Comment-Based Reviews

Enable inline commenting on risk items for lightweight, iterative review feedback during analysis development and draft stages.

Configure Approval-Based Reviews

Set up formal approval workflows with per-reviewer sign-off tracking, rejection handling, and audit trails for compliance with ISO 26262, ISO 14971, and other standards.

Configure Work Item-Based Reviews

Create review tasks as standard Polarion work items with full lifecycle tracking, assignee management, and integration with project dashboards and reports.

Manage Cross-Project Reviews

Coordinate reviews across multiple Polarion projects when risk components, requirements, or mitigation tasks span project boundaries.
Start with comment-based reviews for informal feedback cycles during early risk analysis development. Move to approval-based reviews when you need formal sign-off for regulatory compliance (ISO 26262, ISO 14971, IEC 61508). Use work item-based reviews when review tasks need to be tracked alongside other project work items in Polarion dashboards, sprint plans, or status reports. You can combine strategies — for example, using comments for day-to-day feedback and approvals for milestone sign-offs.
Review process setup depends on Polarion document workflows and user permissions. See Configure Permissions for role-based access control and Set Up Review Process for the initial configuration steps.
KB ArticlesSource Code
  • AppConfig.ts
  • risksheet.json
  • WorkItemBasedReview.java
  • IReview.java
  • SystemConsts.java