Configuration Examples - Nextedy Documentation

TARA Configuration

ISO/SAE 21434 automotive cybersecurity threat analysis with 5-level merge hierarchy, feasibility scoring, and risk verdict matrix.

FMEA Configuration

Failure Mode and Effects Analysis with RPN formulas, Action Priority logic, severity formatting, and cascading cross-document links.

Example Comparison

	TARA	FMEA
Methodology	ISO/SAE 21434 threat analysis	AIAG-VDA / ARP 4761 failure analysis
Hierarchy levels	5 (Stakeholder → Threat Path)	3 (System Element → Cause)
Risk metric	Impact × Feasibility verdict (1-5)	RPN = Severity × Occurrence × Detection
Alternative metric	—	Action Priority (H/M/L logic)
Formulas	2 (feasibility weighted sum, verdict matrix)	3 (initial RPN, revised RPN, Action Priority)
Workflow views	7 phased views	10 step-by-step views
Cross-document links	Task links to risk controls	Upstream/downstream FMEA cascade

Risksheet.json Format Reference — complete property reference for all configuration keys
Levels Configuration — hierarchy merge behavior and level properties
Formula Syntax — JavaScript formula writing guide
Cell Decorators — dynamic cell styling reference
Saved Views — view configuration and column visibility

Start with TARA if your analysis uses a matrix-based risk verdict (impact × likelihood). Start with FMEA if your analysis uses numeric risk priority scoring (severity × occurrence × detection) or AIAG-VDA Action Priority.

Last modified on July 10, 2026

FMEA Configuration ExampleA complete Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) configuration covering both Design FMEA (DFMEA) with numeric Risk Priority Number (RPN) scoring and Process FMEA (PFMEA) with AIAG-VDA Action Priority (AP) scoring.

TARA Configuration

FMEA Configuration

​Example Comparison

​Related Resources

Example Comparison

Related Resources