Steps
1. Navigate to the Safety Readiness Scorecard
From the Home Dashboard, click the Safety Readiness Scorecard link under the Reports section. You’ll see a table showing compliance scores per standard.2. Understand the Metrics Columns
The scorecard displays five metric types for each standard:| Standard | Requirements % | Traceability % | Verification % | FMEA Coverage % | Doc Status | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 26262-4 (System) | 87.1% | 100.0% | 83.9% | 100.0% | 4 specs | 92% |
| AIAG-VDA FMEA | N/A | N/A | N/A | 94.2% | 23 specs | 94% |
- Requirements %: Work items with at least one traceability link ÷ total work items of that type
- Traceability %: Work items with any outgoing or incoming link (refines, verifies, validates, mitigates, assesses) ÷ total
- Verification %: Requirements with back-linked test cases via
verifiesorvalidatesroles ÷ total requirements - FMEA Coverage %: Failure modes with post-mitigation Action Priority set ÷ total failure modes
- Doc Status: Count of specification documents of the relevant type (informational only, not a percentage)
- Overall: Arithmetic mean of applicable numeric metrics (N/A values excluded from average)
3. Interpret ISO 26262 Part-Level Scores
ISO 26262 functional safety is broken down by V-model phase:- Part 3 (Concept): HARA hazards and safety goals. Verify 100% hazards have ASIL assigned and safety goals derived.
- Part 4 (System Design): System requirements, system-level FMEA, traceability to safety goals. Target ≥90% for automotive OEM acceptance.
- Part 5 (Hardware Design): Design requirements, component-level DFMEA, verification test cases. Target ≥95% for hardware release.
- Part 6 (Software Development): Software requirements, software verification. Target 100% for safety-critical software.
4. Interpret AIAG-VDA FMEA Coverage
The FMEA Coverage % metric measures completeness of risk mitigation analysis:- Numerator: Failure modes with
postmitigationAP(Design FMEA) orpfmAPPost(Process FMEA) enumeration set - Denominator: Total failure mode work items across all FMEA documents
- L (Low): Post-mitigation S×O×D yields low risk
- M (Medium): Moderate residual risk, consider additional controls
- H (High): High residual risk, mandatory additional risk controls required
5. Interpret IATF 16949 APQP Metrics
IATF 16949 compliance focuses on special characteristics and control plan coverage:- Requirements %: Characteristics work items with
classificationfield set to SC (Safety Critical) or CC (Critical Component) - Traceability %: Characteristics linked to failure modes (FMEA) and control plan items (APQP)
- Doc Status: Count of control plan documents and process flow diagrams
6. Interpret Overall Compliance Score
The Overall column shows the average of all applicable metrics for that standard. This provides a single readiness indicator:- ≥95%: Ready for baseline or release
- 85-94%: Near completion, address remaining gaps
- 70-84%: Moderate completeness, systematic gap closure needed
- <70%: Early stage, significant work remaining
N/A metrics are excluded from the average. For example, AIAG-VDA FMEA only measures FMEA Coverage %, so Overall equals FMEA Coverage % directly.
7. Use Standards Compliance Overview for Trend Analysis
Navigate to Standards Compliance Overview from the Home Dashboard. This page shows the same metrics in a per-standard drill-down format with color-coded traffic lights:- Green: ≥90% compliance
- Orange: 70-89% compliance
- Red: <70% compliance
Verification
You should now see:- Percentage scores for each standard and metric type
- Color-coded compliance levels (green/orange/red)
- Clickable gap counts that open filtered work item tables
- Overall readiness score per standard
See Also
- Safety Readiness Scorecard — Reference page with metric formulas
- Standards Compliance Overview — Detailed compliance dashboard reference
- Drill Down to Gaps — How to resolve compliance gaps
- Navigate Home Dashboard — Access compliance reports from Home
- ISO 26262 Functional Safety — ISO 26262 standard overview
- AIAG-VDA FMEA Methodology — FMEA methodology concepts