Detection Scale Overview
The detection scale measures how well existing or proposed detection mechanisms can identify a failure mode. Unlike typical automotive FMEA scales where 1 represents the best detection and 10 represents the worst, the Aerospace Safety Solution uses a 6-point scale where 1 represents the best detection capability and 5 represents undetectable failures. A Detection value of 0 indicates the analysis is incomplete.Detection Enumeration Values
| Detection Level | ID | Name | Description | Aerospace Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | Unanalyzed | Analysis incomplete; detection capability not yet assessed | Default value; analysis in progress |
| 1 | 1 | Very High / BITE / Automated | Continuous automated monitoring or hardware watchdog; extremely high likelihood of detection before hazardous condition develops | Built-In Test Equipment (BITE), redundant sensor voting, automated shutdown systems |
| 2 | 2 | High / Periodic Test | Ground-based diagnostic test or scheduled maintenance inspection; high likelihood of detection between flights | Maintenance checks, flight-line testing, health monitoring during scheduled servicing |
| 3 | 3 | Moderate / Crew Alert | Caution/warning system or crew annunciation; moderate likelihood of detection during normal operation | Cockpit alerts, caution/warning lights, EICAS messages, crew notification systems |
| 4 | 4 | Low / Operational Observation | Anomalous behavior detectable during normal operation, but no explicit alerting mechanism; requires crew or operational personnel awareness | Degraded performance, unusual system behavior observed operationally without automated alert |
| 5 | 5 | Very Low / Undetectable | Latent failure with no BITE, no inspection method, and no operational observability; detection impossible before hazard manifests | Single-point failures in dormant systems, failures requiring disassembly to detect |
Detection vs. Occurrence vs. Severity
Detection is one of three inputs to the Risk Priority Number (RPN) formula used in FMEA analysis: \text{RPN} = \text{Severity} \times \text{Occurrence} \times \text{Detection}| Metric | Purpose | Scale | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Severity | How severe is the failure’s effect? | 1 (No Effect) to 5 (Catastrophic) | Impact on safety, performance, or customer satisfaction |
| Occurrence | How likely is the failure to occur? | 0 (Unanalyzed) to 5 (Frequent) | Failure probability per flight hour (1E-9 to >1E-3) |
| Detection | How likely is it to be detected? | 0 (Unanalyzed) to 5 (Undetectable) | Effectiveness of detection/monitoring mechanisms |
A low Detection value (1–2) indicates effective detection mechanisms, which lowers RPN. A high Detection value (4–5) indicates poor detectability, which increases RPN and typically requires mitigation through improved detection or prevention controls.
Pre-Mitigation and Post-Mitigation Detection
The Detection enumeration is used in two contexts within failure mode analysis:Pre-Mitigation Detection
ThepremitigationDetection field captures the detection capability of failure modes before mitigation controls are implemented. This represents the baseline risk assessment.
Post-Mitigation Detection
ThepostmitigationDetection field captures the detection capability after risk controls (improvements to detection mechanisms, BITE upgrades, process changes) are implemented. This demonstrates risk reduction effectiveness.
Custom Field Integration
Detection values are stored in two custom fields on thefailureMode work item type:
| Field Name | Field ID | Type | Default | Pre/Post | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Premitigation Detection | premitigationDetection | Enumeration (detection) | 0 (Unanalyzed) | Pre | Detection capability before mitigation controls |
| Postmitigation Detection | postmitigationDetection | Enumeration (detection) | 0 (Unanalyzed) | Post | Detection capability after mitigation controls |
detection) with the 6 values shown above.
Detection in FMEA Risksheets
Detection columns appear in both System-level FMEA (SFMEA) and Design FMEA (DFMEA) risksheets:Aerospace-Specific Detection Mechanisms
Unlike automotive FMEA, aerospace detection mechanisms are highly specialized and driven by certification requirements (DO-178C, DO-254, ARP 4761):| Detection Mechanism | Detection Level | Examples | Certification Basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| BITE (Built-In Test Equipment) | 1–2 | Continuous health monitoring, redundant voting logic, automated shutdown | DO-254 (HW), DO-178C (SW) |
| Periodic Maintenance Inspection | 2 | Flight-line checks, borescope inspections, functional tests between flights | ARP 4161 (Maintenance) |
| Crew Annunciation | 3 | Master caution/warning lights, EICAS messages, flight deck alerts | ARP 4754A (Safety Assessment) |
| Operational Observation | 4 | Crew detects performance degradation or unusual behavior during normal flight operations | Operational procedures, crew training |
| Latent/Undetectable | 5 | Single-point failures in dormant systems, failures only revealed by accident | High-integrity redundancy required |
Specific detection mechanisms and their classification within your project may vary based on system architecture and certification strategy. Consult your Safety Assessment (PSSA/SSA) and Failure Mode Analysis documents for project-specific detection strategy.
RPN Calculation Example
Consider a failure mode in an aircraft fuel system:Visual Detection Assessment Matrix
Grounding and Validation
This page documents the Detection enumeration as defined in the Aerospace Safety Solution codebase. Project-specific detection strategies, mechanism classifications, and RPN thresholds may differ. Consult your project’s:
- Safety Assessment Plan (SAP) for detection strategy
- Failure Mode Analysis (FMA) documentation for mechanism details
- Risk Control documentation for mitigation-driven detection improvements
Source References (dev)
Source References (dev)
Code:
.polarion/tracker/fields/failureMode-custom-fields.xml (0.57) · .polarion/tracker/fields/failureMode-detection-enum.xml (0.55) · .polarion/nextedy/models/rtm.yaml (0.53) · .polarion/pages/spaces/_default/Requirements Traceability Summary/page.xml, Verification Validation Summary/page.xml, Risk Control Effectiveness Report/page.xml, System Decomposition Report/page.xml, FMEA Coverage Report/page.xml, Classification Consistency Report/page.xml, System FMEA Report/page.xml, System Structure Navigator/page.xml (0.52) · .polarion/pages/scripts/velocity/nextedy_solutions.vm (0.51) · .polarion/nextedy/sheet-configurations/MIL-STD-882E Hazard Tracking Log.yaml (0.49) · modules/RiskTemplates/SubSystem-FMEATemplate/attachments/risksheet.json (0.48) · .polarion/tracker/fields/failureMode-fmOccurrence-enum.xml (0.47) · .polarion/tracker/fields/resolution-enum.xml, .polarion/tracker/fields/changerequest-resolution-enum.xml, .polarion/tracker/fields/changerequest-status-enum.xml, .polarion/tracker/fields/work-record-type-enum.xml, .polarion/tracker/fields/yesno-enum.xml (0.47) · .polarion/nextedy/sheet-configurations/ARP 4761 Safety Assessment Traceability.yaml (0.46)