Skip to main content

Overview

The CCA Risksheet organizes common cause events using a 3-level hierarchy: diagram The risksheet contains 8 columns organized for identifying common cause events, the functions and failure modes they affect, and corrective actions. All three analysis types must be completed as part of a comprehensive ARP 4761 safety assessment.

Column Structure

Column NameTypeDescription
Zone/AreaSystem ElementIdentifies the system zone, area, or location where the common cause could originate
Analysis TypeEnumerationType of common cause analysis: ZSA (Zonal), PRA (Particular Risk), or CMA (Common Mode)
Event DescriptionTextDescription of the potential common cause event
Affected FunctionsLinkReferences to system functions or subsystems that could be affected
Failure ModesLinkReferences to related failure modes from SFMEA/DFMEA documents
Potential EffectsTextConsequences of the common cause event affecting multiple items
Risk AssessmentEnumerationInitial risk level (High/Medium/Low) based on probability and severity
Corrective ActionsLinkReferences to risk controls or design changes to prevent or mitigate the common cause

Analysis Type Color Coding

The CCA Risksheet uses color coding to distinguish between the three required analysis types, enabling quick visual scanning:
Analysis TypeColorAbbreviationPurpose
Zonal Safety AnalysisIndigoZSAIdentifies common causes originating from a specific zone (e.g., lightning, heat, vibration in a physical location)
Particular Risk AnalysisRedPRAAnalyzes risks particular to a specific function or failure mode that could propagate through dependencies
Common Mode AnalysisTealCMAIdentifies design or operational scenarios where multiple failures occur from a single root cause
The analysis type color is applied to the row header for visual clarity across the entire row.

Hierarchy and Organization

The CCA Risksheet implements a 3-level hierarchy:

Level 1: Zone/Area

The top level groups events by physical location or logical area within the system. Examples:
  • Electrical compartment
  • Flight deck
  • Engine bay
  • Software subsystem
  • Power distribution network

Level 2: Analysis Type

Each zone contains events organized by the three analysis types (ZSA, PRA, CMA). ARP 4761 requires all three perspectives to be analyzed for comprehensive common cause coverage.

Level 3: Common Cause Event

Individual events are listed at the lowest level, each with:
  • Event description
  • Affected functions/failure modes
  • Potential effects across the system
  • Risk assessment
  • Corrective actions or preventive measures

Views

The CCA Risksheet provides four specialized views to support different analysis workflows:

Full Analysis View

Displays all columns and all hierarchy levels, enabling comprehensive review of common cause events across all analysis types.

By Zone View

Groups events primarily by zone, allowing safety engineers to focus on location-based common causes and their cross-system effects.

By Analysis Type View

Organizes events by ZSA/PRA/CMA type, supporting focused analysis of each methodology and cross-checking for gaps.

Actions View

Focuses on corrective actions, displaying:
  • Event description
  • Assigned responsibility (owner)
  • Action status (Open/In Progress/Complete)
  • Linked risk controls
  • Verification evidence
This view supports mitigation planning and tracking throughout the development lifecycle.

Risk Type and Work Items

PropertyValueDescription
Risk TypecommonCauseEventThe primary work item type used in the CCA Risksheet
Work Item Hierarchy3 levelsZone → Analysis Type → Event
Task TyperiskControlCorrective actions and preventive measures linked via mitigates role

Configuration Details

The following details are based on the CCA template structure. Verify specific column properties, formula definitions, and cell styling rules in the Risksheet configuration UI.

Row Header Coloring

The row header background color is applied based on the analysis type:
ZSA (Zonal Safety Analysis):       Indigo (#3f51b5)
PRA (Particular Risk Analysis):    Red (#e53935)
CMA (Common Mode Analysis):        Teal (#009688)

Analysis Type Selection

The Analysis Type column is typically configured as an enumerated picker with three valid values:
enum AnalysisType {
  "ZSA" = "Zonal Safety Analysis",
  "PRA" = "Particular Risk Analysis",
  "CMA" = "Common Mode Analysis"
}

Linked Items

Link RoleSourceTargetCardinalityPurpose
affectscommonCauseEventfunction, failureModeManyFunctions or failure modes impacted by the common cause
mitigatesriskControlcommonCauseEventManyRisk controls that prevent or mitigate the common cause

Key Workflow Patterns

1. Creating a Common Cause Analysis

  1. Decompose the system into zones or areas using system element hierarchy
  2. For each zone, create one set of ZSA events (zone-specific common causes)
  3. Create PRA events analyzing particular risks from subsystem interdependencies
  4. Create CMA events identifying design weaknesses or operational scenarios with multiple failure modes
  5. Link each event to affected functions and failure modes from SFMEA/DFMEA
  6. Assign risk assessments and corrective actions

2. Linking to System FMEA

Common cause events discovered during CCA analysis should be:
  • Cross-referenced in the System SFMEA as potential downstream risks
  • Allocated to subsystem SFMEAs for detailed failure mode analysis
  • Traced back to design requirements for verification and validation
  • Tracked through risk controls until closure

3. Verification and Closure

Corrective actions are tracked as risk control tasks with:
  • Description of the preventive or mitigating measure
  • Responsible engineer assignment
  • Verification method (design review, analysis, test)
  • Closure evidence from verification documents
All three analysis types (ZSA, PRA, CMA) must be completed for a comprehensive common cause assessment. Ensure zone coverage is complete and interdependencies between subsystems are thoroughly analyzed.
The CCA analysis supports and connects to other safety assessment documents in the Aerospace Safety Solution:

Visual Reference: CCA Analysis Type Matrix

diagram
ZSA focuses on where common causes can originate (physical zones). PRA examines what particular design or operational risks could cause cascading failures. CMA investigates how multiple failures can occur from single root causes. Together, they provide comprehensive common cause coverage required by ARP 4761.
Code: modules/RiskTemplates/CCATemplate/attachments/risksheet.json (0.70) · modules/Risks/COMPLIANCE-001/module.xml, modules/Risks/MIL-STD-882E-HTS-001/module.xml, modules/Risks/SEC-THREAT-001/module.xml, modules/Risks/SFMEA-SUB-001/module.xml, modules/Risks/SFMEA-SUB-002/module.xml, modules/Risks/SFMEA-SUB-003/module.xml (0.59) · .polarion/polarion-project.xml, .polarion/context.properties, .polarion/security/user-roles.xml, .claude/PROJECT.md, TODO.md (0.58) · modules/RiskTemplates/RiskControlPlanTemplate/attachments/risksheet.json (0.58) · datasets/sol-aero-ui-walkthrough/summary.md, navigation.md, dashboards/home-dashboard.md, dashboards/role-dashboards.md, dashboards/standards-compliance.md, risksheet-views/risksheet-views.md, work-item-types/data-model.md (0.57) · modules/RiskTemplates/SSATemplate/attachments/risksheet.json (0.57) · modules/RiskTemplates/PSSATemplate/attachments/risksheet.json (0.56) · modules/RiskTemplates/HazardTrackingTemplate/attachments/risksheet.json (0.53) · modules/RiskTemplates/DFMEATemplate/attachments/risksheet.json (0.52) · modules/RiskTemplates/SecurityThreatTemplate/attachments/risksheet.json (0.52)