Skip to main content

Prerequisites

Before rating SEC parameters, ensure you have:
  • Created a HARA document with the HARA risksheet template
  • Identified hazards with complete operational situation descriptions
  • Access to ISO 26262-3 Tables 1-4 (severity/exposure/controllability definitions)

Rate Severity (S0-S3)

  1. Open your HARA document in Polarion
  2. Switch to the HARA Classification view in the risksheet
  3. For each hazard row, click the Severity column dropdown
  4. Select the appropriate S-rating based on potential harm:
RatingDefinitionExample
S0No injuriesNuisance warning light activation
S1Light/moderate injuriesMinor whiplash from delayed braking
S2Severe/life-threatening injuriesCollision with pedestrian at low speed
S3Life-threatening/fatal injuriesHigh-speed collision, loss of steering control
Focus on the worst credible harm to occupants or other road users, not the most likely outcome. Consider vulnerable road users (pedestrians, cyclists) as well as vehicle occupants.

Rate Exposure (E0-E4)

  1. In the same risksheet row, click the Exposure column dropdown
  2. Rate based on how frequently the operational situation occurs:
RatingDefinitionExample
E0IncredibleSpecific sensor failure + rare weather + specific road geometry
E1Very low probabilityExtreme environmental conditions (heavy fog + night + rain)
E2Low probabilityOccasional driving scenarios (parking maneuvers)
E3Medium probabilityFrequent scenarios (highway cruise, urban traffic)
E4High probabilityContinuous operation (vehicle speed monitoring, brake availability)
Rate how often the operational situation occurs during vehicle lifetime, not how often the hazard manifests. A failure mode may be rare, but if it affects a continuous operation (E4), exposure is high.

Rate Controllability (C0-C3)

  1. Click the Controllability column dropdown for each hazard
  2. Rate based on the average driver’s ability to prevent harm:
RatingDefinitionDriver Control %Example
C0Controllable in general100%ABS warning light (no performance impact)
C1Simply controllable>99%Gradual brake fade with warning
C2Normally controllable>90%Single sensor loss with degraded AEB performance
C3Difficult/uncontrollable<90%Total brake failure at highway speed
  • Reaction time available: Seconds or milliseconds?
  • Driver awareness: Is there a warning before hazardous event?
  • Required skill level: Can an average driver respond effectively?
  • Physical demands: Does control require extreme force or precision?

Verify ASIL Calculation

After rating all three parameters, the risksheet automatically computes ASIL:
ASIL = lookup_matrix(Severity, Exposure, Controllability)
ASIL Matrix (ISO 26262-3 Table 4):
        E1      E2      E3      E4
S1  C1  QM      QM      QM      A
    C2  QM      QM      A       B
    C3  QM      A       B       C

S2  C1  QM      QM      A       B
    C2  QM      A       B       C
    C3  A       B       C       D

S3  C1  QM      A       B       C
    C2  A       B       C       D
    C3  B       C       D       D
If Controllability = C0 (controllable in general) or Exposure = E0 (incredible), the ASIL is automatically QM (Quality Management) regardless of severity. No safety goals are required.

Document Rationale

  1. Click the hazard row to open the work item form
  2. Scroll to the HARA Rationale text field
  3. Document your reasoning for each S/E/C rating:
    • Reference ISO 26262 table definitions
    • Cite analysis data (e.g., operational frequency statistics)
    • Note assumptions (e.g., “assumes average driver with valid license”)
    • Reference expert judgement or safety workshops
Example Rationale:
S3: Total loss of braking at highway speed (>100 km/h) is 
life-threatening per ISO 26262-3 Table 1.

E4: Highway driving represents >40% of total vehicle operating time 
(source: usage profile study, Doc-AEB-2025-01).

C3: Emergency stop from 100 km/h with zero brake force is uncontrollable 
by average driver. No alternative braking method available.

ASIL D assigned per ISO 26262-3 Table 4 (S3-E4-C3).

ASCII Workflow Diagram

diagram

Verification Steps

You should now see:
  • All hazards with S/E/C ratings assigned (no empty cells in HARA Classification view)
  • ASIL values automatically computed for each hazard
  • Rationale field populated for each hazard with audit-trail justification
  • High ASIL values (C/D) highlighted if traffic light decorators are configured
The risksheet should display color-coded cells (green for low risk, red for C3/S3) if cell decorators are enabled in the HARA Risksheet Configuration.

Common Pitfalls

Exposure rates the operational situation frequency, not how often the component fails. A rare failure mode (1 in 10⁶ hours) affecting continuous operation still gets E4 if the operation runs continuously.
Use the >99% / >90% driver control thresholds from ISO 26262-3 Table 3. Don’t assume expert drivers or ideal conditions (dry road, daylight, full attention).

See Also